Now let us define what we mean by a change.
There are two kinds of changes, instantaneous changes and eventual changes.
The first type appears for example, when we consider a lamp
that is being turned on as a situoid. In the initial situation, the
lamp is off. Then there is the process of turning the lamp on. Let us
end this situoid and the process of turning on the lamp with the lamp
still being off. This is the terminal situation of the first
situoid. A successive situoid starts with the lamp being on. The
initial situation of the second, , coincides with the terminal
situation of the first,
. At least one infon changed polarity,
and therefore
, and
is a change.
Let us consider the same process of turning on a lamp in a somewhat
larger situoid. Then, the lamp is turned off in the initial situation,
, but turned on in the terminal situation,
. Those two
situations do not exist on coinciding time boundaries, but again, at
least one infon changed polarity, and therefore
is again a
change.
Considering two situations, and
. What happens, if there is
an infon
that obtains in
, but neither
nor its complement
obtains in
. Would we consider this a change? Our answer is yes, because
somehow, information appears to have got lost. If we start out knowing
the lamp is turned off, but we end up with a situation in which no
information about the lamp's being on or off is present, certainly
something changed.
Another problem appears, when we consider two seemingly unrelated
situations, for example one, , with the lamp being turned off, and
another one,
, with John kissing Mary. Most people would not
consider this a proper change, although both situations are totally
different. This may even be the case with coinciding situations.
As changes happen in the frame of situoids, we will state another
axiom, in order to prevent these types of changes.
Changes therefore have to be considered with respect to a situoid.
leechuck 2005-04-19